1
Bridge Builders
250 words · Choose one angle · Show the specific mechanics of connecting people across difference
250 words
We are looking for students who want to be bridge builders — students who can connect people, groups, and ideas to span divides, foster understanding, and promote collaboration within a dynamic, interconnected, and vibrant global academic community. We are eager for you to tell us how your experiences have helped you understand what qualities and efforts are needed to bridge divides so that people can better learn and work together.
Choose one angle — the one where you have the most specific story:
Angle 1
Different Perspective
A one-on-one encounter with a view you didn't share. What did you learn about yourself, the other person, or the world — and how did you engage across the divide?
Highest signal
Angle 2
Mixed-Background Collaboration
A group challenge where different backgrounds or perspectives created friction. What role did you play in helping people work together? What moves did you make?
Angle 3
Observing a Bridge Builder
Someone you watched who excels at helping people think or work together. How do they set the stage? How do they handle difficulty? What did you take from observing them?
Bridge-building moves — show 2–4 of these happening in your story, don't list them:
Ask clarifying questions firstBefore arguing, name what's actually in dispute — values, facts, priorities, or definitions.
Restate their view accuratelySo they feel heard before you respond. This is harder than it sounds under friction.
Identify shared goalsFind what everyone agrees on, then separate it from disagreements about approach or tactics.
Name constraints out loudTime, resources, fairness, safety, roles. Making the real obstacles visible reduces assumed bad faith.
Propose a test or pilotA small experiment both sides can accept reduces risk and breaks deadlocks on approach.
Translate across contextsJargon, cultural cues, assumptions — making these visible lets more people participate fully.
What to include
- Real stakes: project outcome, community decision, service tension, cross-cultural friction — not petty arguments
- Name the divide neutrally: "We agreed on the goal but disagreed on approach because we were optimizing for different risks"
- Include a cost or difficulty — if it was easy, it's not persuasive
- Show the moves happening in the story, not as a list of values
- What you learned — a specific behavioral takeaway, not "I learned to respect others"
Avoid
- Making yourself the hero of humanity who enlightened everyone
- "I value diversity and inclusion" — statement of values with no evidence
- Internet arguments, "I educated them with facts," anything where you clearly win
- Blending all three angles — pick one and go deep
- Drama without mechanics — tension is good, but show what you did with it
Structure (250 words)
40–60 wordsScene + the divide — what was at stake, who disagreed, and why it mattered
100–130 wordsThe mechanics: 2–4 specific moves you made to bridge the divide — shown in action
30–50 wordsThe cost/difficulty + what changed because of your effort
25–40 wordsWhat you learned — a behavioral insight you carry forward